Parish Council/Health Insurance Details

By : Deborah C. White
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, October 15, 2009 5:12 AM CDT

Sometime in July I made a Public Records request for the information regarding which council members that were taking advantage of the Health Insurance offered by Iberia Parish Government. At first I received a reply from the Human Resource Director which stated they could not provide me with this list because it would involve or expose family members and this was against their policy. I then made another request for simply a list of which council members were using the insurance and what was the cost to Iberia Parish Government for this coverage. In a letter dated July 27, 2009 I received the following from Human Resource Director:

 

"On July 23, 2009 you made a public records request for a list of names of council members that are using healthcare insurance provided by Iberia Parish Government. The following council members are on our health plan:

Advertisement
1. Boudoin, Curtis

 

2. Daniels, Maggie

 

3. Duncan, Roger

 

4. Fitch, Jerome

 

5. Hulin, Naray

 

6. Landry, Thomas

 

7. Romero, Glenn

 

8. Williams,Charles

 

It is my understanding that employee deductions are excluded from public records request.

 

Sincerely,

 

Donna L. McDonald

 

Director, Human Resources"

 

After receiving this letter I requested

again the amount that the Iberia Parish government pays for the health insurance premiums. On August 6, 2009 I received the following letter from the Human Resource Director.

"Pursuant to advice from our legal council, Mr. Eric Duplantis, it is his position that the dollar amount of health insurance premiums would be exempt from the Public Records Act. Mr. Duplantis will continue to research this request.

 

Sincerely,

 

Donna L. McDonald

 

Director, Human Resources

 

I again called and spoke to the Human Resource Director and asked how can something that is paid by Iberia Parish Government, figured into their annual budget not be available to the public. This was once again check into and on Sept. 9, 2009 I finally received a chart from Iberia Parish Government listing what type of coverage (employee, employee and spouse, employee with child, and employee with family). The chart also showed me the total monthly premium, what the employee portion of payment was, employee bi-weekly portion of payment and the cost that Iberia Parish Government paid for each type of coverage. It is as follows:

1. Employee Only, Total Monthly Premium $425,15, Employee Monthly Premium $53.14, Employee biweekly Portion of Premium $26.57 and IPG Portion of Premium $372.01

 

2. Employee and Spouse, Total Monthly Premium $850.31, Employee Monthly Portion of Premium $108.30, Employee Biweekly Portion of Premium $53.15 and IPG Portion of Premium $744.01

 

3. Employee and Child, Total Monthly Premium $786.55, Employee Monthly Portion of Premium $98.31, Employee Biweekly Portion of Premium $49.16 and IPG Portion of Premium $688.23

 

4. Employee and Family, Total Monthly Premium $1,211.68, Employee Portion of Premium $151.46, Employee Biweekly Portion of Premium and IPG Portion of Premium $1,060.22

 

In my possession I have copies of all these documents just as anyone could if you made the Public Records Request.

Let's look at the list of council members that are on the IPG Health Insurance Plan paid for by the tax payers.

1. Curtis Boudoin: Most likely already on Medicare and is using this IPG plan as a supplement to his medicare instead of purchasing his own he is purchasing one that the bulk of the premium is paid for by tax payers.

2. Maggie Daniels: Employed by the Iberia Parish School Board, has access to health insurance with the school board but it would cost her more money for this coverage so she uses chooses to use the IPG plan which is cheaper and the bulk is paid for by the tax payers.

3. Roger Duncan: Appears to be self employed, most likely has coverage for himself and his wife unless he still has school age children then it falls under the family coverage. Self employed individuals normally do not carry health insurance for them nor their employees unless they are a large company. Instead of seeking a policy on his own he chooses to use the IPG health insurance in which the bulk is paid for by the tax payers.

4. Jerome Fitch: Another self employed construction worker that has no insurance coverage nor his employees. He may have only coverage for himself and his spouse unless he has school age children then he would have family coverage. Instead of seeking a policy on his own he chooses to use the IPG health insurance in which the bulk is paid for by the tax payers.

5. Naray Hulin: He and his wife are both employed as school bus drivers in this parish. They could most likely have coverage through the school board for the bus drivers association. I would venture to say that he has coverage with IPG for himself and his spouse since they no longer have school age children. Instead of seeking a policy on his own he chooses to use the IPG health insurance in which the bulk is paid for by the tax payers.

6. Thomas Landry: He has a successful business as a Physical Therapist and his wife has a success retail store. He must not offer health insurance for his employees. He is considered somewhat part of the medical field. Do we know anyone that is hurting in the medical field? I must say, his place of business is a very good place to go for physical therapy as I have been a patient there in the past. I would venture to say he has employee and spouse coverage and maybe the possibility of still have school age children, not positive. In which case he would at least have employee and spouse coverage with IPG. Instead of seeking a policy on his own he chooses to use the IPG health insurance which the bulk is paid for by the tax payers.

7. Glenn Romero: A self employed business man that must not have insurance coverage for himself or employee. No children at home of school age so therefore I would venture to say he has health insurance coverage for himself and his spouse. Instead of seeking a policy on his own he chooses to use the IPG health insurance which the bulk is paid for by the tax payers.

8. Charles Williams: From previous years was injured on the job and not sure what type of insurance coverage he could possibly have. It could possibly be Workerman's Comp or Social Security Disability. Being a person that comes from a similar situation I could understand why he might choose to use IPG health insurance because in this type of situation you are on a limited income. I just wonder if he has Medicare if he is using IPG coverage for a supplement. I know I write a check every month for $267.20 for a supplement. This is a big chunk for someone on a fixed income.

Now, you have the figures on the cost to Iberia Parish Government so go figure out what it must be costing or close to it as to what Iberia Parish Government is paying for Health Insurance for a elected, public servant part time position. Think about this when you go to the polls Saturday October 17, 2009, this weekend to vote. When you see Proposition No. 1 regarding Compensation or Raise for parish council members and giving them the right to increase their salary every 2 years, "VOTE NO!" Thank you for taking the time to read this information.

Comments

    No Way wrote on Oct 23, 2009 12:41 AM:

    " I don't think anyone who works for parish council, fulltime, gets tested.

    Why the difference? "

    Duh wrote on Oct 23, 2009 12:38 AM:

    " Notice Maggie Daniels: Spokeswoman for the "people" where in fact she is a part-time (at best) parish employee but uses the benefits.

    Maggie, sign up for health care at the school board where you work full-time. "

    To IF THEY ARE wrote on Oct 21, 2009 10:29 AM:

    " Right on!
    Parish and City Employees are drug tested, why are they special?
    I think it is time for some of this to urinate in a bottle
    and way past time for others to BLOW!!!
    I think this should include ALL board members in this parish. Paid or Unpaid! "

    voter wrote on Oct 20, 2009 5:42 PM:

    " Thanks to informed voter in Saturday's election, the raise for Parish Council members was defeated. I applaud all voters who went to the polls and voted NO. As it was said before, if you don't like the pay, quit. Give someone else a chance to bring something new to the table. "

    Same Ole Same Ole wrote on Oct 20, 2009 5:36 PM:

    " Pay Attention,

    Ever consider how much jury duty pays? In 30 years at 2.5% increase per year would the jury duty pay not be quite acceptable in this day and age?

    I have seen how my self employed councilman fits into this insurance picture and I welcome him to knock on my door at re-election time. Then again it would be the first time in 3 terms. "

    Same Ole Same Ole wrote on Oct 20, 2009 5:34 PM:

    " First comment to Happy Camper. The very small tax contribution from their paychecks does not even come close to paying for their insurance. A small portion yes but the remainder comes from the rest of US. Slightly slanted view of that you have I must say. A councilman should not run for the benefit of a salary OR benefits but instead should run for the good of his district just as a teacher teaches for a cause and not for money. Then maybe we would see some different faces if they ever got tired ofthebenefits. "

    Fair wrote on Oct 20, 2009 3:51 PM:

    " How many of you who posted a reply to Deborah White's article are employed? If you are, how many of you get a raise every year? That many, then why do you feel these individuals don't deserve a raise. If anyone had a problem with it, why didn't come to the meeting and discuss this? I am sure this could have been resolved without this nonesense. It is obvious these individuals are doing a good job because how many went in uncontested? "

    Pay attention wrote on Oct 20, 2009 3:45 PM:

    " Does anyone realize that this if the council members would have received a 2.5 % raised every year for the last 32 years (that's how long Joe Boudoin has been in office), what their salary would be? Everyone talks about the economy, well when it was good, the voters still wouldn't give them a raise. These are the individuals who get up during the night when you call -not the Parish President. Let's talk about the car allowances- Mr. Freyou $750 per month, Sally $500 per month just to name a few. What the councilmembers 0. "

    Happy Camper wrote on Oct 20, 2009 3:36 PM:

    " Deborah White needs to get a LIFE. It is optional for the councilmembers to get insurance as is all parish employees. My question to to Ms. White are these individuals taxpayers also. So, if a portion is coming out of their salary and the council members are taxpayer..aren't they paying for the insurance? I don't think you thought this out clearly. Besides I think you have a personal issue or something to brought to the council and it didn't work out your way. Well, SOUR GRAPES TO YOU! "

    IF THEY ARE wrote on Oct 20, 2009 8:15 AM:

    " If the council members are employees, why do they not have to take physicals? Also why do they not have to take drug tests? All Parish employees are supposed to be randomly tested. "

    JIMMY wrote on Oct 19, 2009 10:08 PM:

    " NO raise, great. Now all of the council members that were begging for more money can choose not to run again. PLEASE. Move your sorry behinds out of the way and give someone else a chance to run. One or two terms is long enough. You keep running to subsidise your income, not to serve the public. "

    Same Ole Same Ole wrote on Oct 19, 2009 10:01 AM:

    " Ms. White,

    Very well said. I will not beat a dead horse too much here, but thanks to those who voted against the raise. I agree with ALL of the aforementioned comments against the raise, ins, etc. My one surprise is that Mr. Comeaux is not taking advantage of the insurance benefit. I would guess that his wife's plan is more competitively priced.

    Time to vote in some new faces. "

    Jack from Lydia. wrote on Oct 16, 2009 5:47 PM:

    " Thanks Debbie for the information. My wife and I are voting against all the items on the ballot, Parish Council and School Board. Too many people are out of jobs to start taking 400 hundred dollars a month from other projects in the Parish to pay council members. I hope everyone does the same. Keep up the great work. "

    Brian wrote on Oct 16, 2009 9:51 AM:

    " Come on Deb , that axe you've been grinding against the council must be worn down to the handle by now. It's one thing to call out discrepancies , but health insurance? If it's budegted , and the parish can afford it , why the heck not? Why not let everybody know you are STILL bitter at not being chosen as a board member? Stop the needless crying, and run for office , or pick a positive cause to champion. The rants have become tiresome. "

    Area Resident wrote on Oct 16, 2009 8:46 AM:

    " Health insurance is a policy that has been in place probably since the beginning of the parish council. Instead of cutting health insurance premiums to employees, why not cut travel expenses? Why not cut entertainment? There are other things besides taking away benefits that will pave the roads and provide sewerage. How would you like it if your employer yanked your health insurance to cover costs for other things in the company? Parish vehicles can be cut, etc. I might run for Parish council to save over $600.00/month I pay in premiums. "

    Deborah C. White wrote on Oct 16, 2009 8:28 AM:

    " Just for the record. My problem with this raise issue is the fact that it will be more than an 80% raise not just a 3% like the working people that work for this parish gets. This is in an ordinance set and voted on by this same council. Give the working people in the fields 3% but give themselves over an 80% raise. This just does not set too well with me. I pray others when they vote view it the same way I view this situation. Can you imagine.....an 80% raise in-one-time-lick-plus-health-insurance-benefits-for-some-of-them. "

    disgusted wrote on Oct 15, 2009 11:03 PM:

    " i attended the council parish meeting on wed night and was appauld to here one council member say he has served for eighteen years. how sweet is that to finally realize its time to wipe the slate clean. that council is nothing but a big joke with the same ole same ole. we need to get rid of that whole council as well as the cao and the parish president. "

    Area Resident wrote on Oct 15, 2009 8:41 PM:

    " Well I guess two out of the 3 parts to my post is better than none! "

    Deborah C. White wrote on Oct 15, 2009 6:40 PM:

    " To: Give The Raise
    It is funny how they never have funds for anything else that is important to the citizens of this parish. Do you have decent roads? Do you have sewage problems? Interlude Sub. has had sewage problems since the 80's and still nothing has been done although approached by these residents several times. Can they afford it? It seems they don't have those type of funds for other things but they always have funds, and then at a really bad time to try to get a raise. Try attending-meetings-and-actually-see-what-they-do-on-a-regular-basis. Go-see-for-yourself! "

    Outraged wrote on Oct 15, 2009 6:17 PM:

    " To Jackie:
    You sound like some teachers that go to college for 4 years to become a teacher knowing what the profession pays and after they become teachers want to COMPLAIN about the poor pay!!!!
    These people knew what they were campaigning for when they ran for OFFICE!!!
    They like to call themselves PUBLIC SERVANTS, I call them PROSTATICANS!!!!
    If they are unhappy because the public won't pay for their increases then they can QUIT!!!!
    Vote NO for Prop 1 Saturday!!! "

    Delcambre wrote on Oct 15, 2009 6:11 PM:

    " Jackie they chose to run for this office knowing what they where in for. If they felt they didn't want to attend meetings or take care of the people in there district then they shouldn't have run. If they didn't like the pay then they shouldn't have run. This is there part time job. If I would go get me a part time job I sure wouldn't be offered this health insurance. My husband has a full time job that keeps him away from home 6 months out of the year and we have health insurance. "

    Give the Raise wrote on Oct 15, 2009 4:46 PM:

    " Seems like a lot of energy and anger over public officials receiving the benefit of health insurance coverage. Perhaps because health insurance coverage has gotten so expensive we begrudge others having coverage.
    Truth of the matter is that one of the benefits public servants (police, fire, school teachers, city and parish employees) receive are health insurance, retirement, vacation, etc., perhaps the real issue is whether we can afford to provide these benefits.
    Clearly it is time to also give our Parish Council Representatives a raise, although the suggestion always seems to bring out the worst behavior in some people. "

    the plumber wrote on Oct 15, 2009 2:23 PM:

    " Great job, everyone I know is voting against this its a part time job at best they should be ashamed of themselfs this is as close to stealing you can get without using a gun. Get the word out VOTE NO. "

    Area Resident wrote on Oct 15, 2009 2:18 PM:

    " Just another note: If you are in favor of President Obama's health care reform, then you will have to get use to the idea of having to pay for this insurance. In fact this health care reform will make me have to offer and pay for health care for my employees. Like small businesses aren't stuggling enough. I would love to be able to pay considerably less for my health insurance premiums. "

    Area Resident wrote on Oct 15, 2009 2:11 PM:

    " OK so is this all about choosing a cheaper policy for yourself and family or not getting raises?
    You are loading another bucket when you start talking about full time elected officials having health insurance. You discontinue for those and you have to discontinue for all parish employees. If I had an opportunity to get cheaper premiums and smaller deductibles through my employer, he77 yes I would go for it. And you can't blame these people. They are accepting what is offered to them. cont'd "

    jackie wrote on Oct 15, 2009 1:16 PM:

    " to all that are complaining on this forum what have you done for your parish does it include weekly meetings constant phone time and added stress. For the amount that the council men/women are paid for their service the least the goverment can do is pay for their healthcare. Go and attack the other goverment payed officials who are sucking this country dry. Leave our council men/women alone . Besides if some one offered you a better healcare plan than your current one with better rates and copays would you deny it !LOL Find something else to complain about. "

    Deborah C. White wrote on Oct 15, 2009 11:32 AM:

    " To Barbara,
    I do not have a definate answer to your question regarding health care insurance for other parish officials. If I had to make an educated guess, I would say yes, they are entitled to health insurance coverage. Almost all people who work in government are entitled to these type of benefits, plus. Have a great day! "

    Thanks for the info wrote on Oct 15, 2009 10:01 AM:

    " Thanks for the information. I will be voting NO on Proposition 1. "

    Unbelievable wrote on Oct 15, 2009 8:30 AM:

    " Kudo's to the other 6 public servants for not burdening the taxpayers with additional expenditures. It is appalling & embarrassing to read Thomas Landry is included in this list. I suppose all those billboard advertisements, trips to New Orleans and market creates a hardship for him to pay insurance. UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!! Shame on you Thomas Landry. "

    To Barbara wrote on Oct 15, 2009 8:30 AM:

    " Thank you for the information provided on which parish council members have health insurance paid for by the taxpayers. You certainly did a great job and your persistence is remarkable. Do you know if any other elected officials are offered the same opportunity to buy health insurance like the parish ? ie: clerk of court,assessor,etc. Thanks again for keeping us informed. Sadly, the voter turn out will be extremely low, and if people are not reminded about the election, they won't vote. Joe Boudoin is going door to door asking people to vote for his raise. "

    jd wrote on Oct 15, 2009 8:25 AM:

    " thank you for the information, Thank you, thank you, thank you. "

    Outraged wrote on Oct 15, 2009 7:58 AM:

    " Excellent work!!!
    I will NOT support Prop 1 even before reading this! It's enlightening to see how much they and their families get at taxpayers expense!!!
    If only we could get such LOW premiums!!!!
    Sort of like CONGRESS!!!
    THE ELECTED ELITE!!!! "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment related to this story. Use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

•Comments must be approved by an editor or the publisher before appearing on the Web site but are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person supposedly posting an comment. Please consider this as you consider any statement made. A thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

• Please note your comments must attempt to follow basic rules of grammar and punctuation or they will not be posted. Do not use unfamiliar abbreviations or text-like short cuts, like ur for your. Please keep your tone civil. You can say someone's idea is stupid but you cannot say someone is stupid.

• Comments should deal with matters of public concern. Problems with private individuals or private companies are not likely to get posted.

• Questions or comments about items posted should be e-mailed to dailyiberian@bellsouth.net.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds


Contact Us

Subscribe
Vacation Hold
General Email

Mailing Address:
The Daily Iberian
P.O. Box 9290
New Iberia, LA
70562-9290

Street Address:
926 East Main St.
New Iberia, LA 70560

Phone:
(337) 365-6773

Fax:
(337)-367-9640

Inside Louisiana:
800-365-6773

Local Weather