DISGUSTED AND ASHAMED

By DOUG
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, June 27, 2009 12:38 PM CDT

I attended the Emergency City Council meeting last night.  I am extremely disappointed in our council members, especially Freddie Decourt and Robert Suire.  After Louis Ackal makes a public spectacle of himself and threatens the citizens of New Iberia caved in to his demands.  This is not the first time either!  Several weeks ago, he was granted $700,000 after he ranted and raved that he could not operate on the contracted amount for city enforcement.  That just helped him pay off one loan.  He comes back again this week and threatens to remove city enforcement until his demands are met.  After discussion (and an agreed  amount previously discussed in a meeting with Gov. Jindal), the council met his demands again.  However, Mr. Ackal was still dissatisfied with the agreed upon amount and requested even more money!  Which was granted!  How many times are we going to allow this man to hold us hostage by threats!  If he cannot provide the protection we need, bring back the Police Department!  We could have started it up again with the amounts that were given to him in the last few weeks.  And, as for Mr. Decourt and Mr. Suire, why were they siding with this maniac?  Do they have a separate agenda they are working on?  Mr. Suire's daughter is employed by the Sheriff's Dept.  Is this not a conflict of interest?  I promised you, I will not vote for any politicians who use such tactics to get what he wants or for any politicians who cannot stand up against big bullies and stand up for what is right for the citizens that elected them into office.  Good luck, Citizens!  What are we going to have to give up or pay more for now because Ackal cannot learn how to live within a budget!

Advertisement

Comments

    dee of Florida wrote on Jul 29, 2009 5:24 PM:

    " the whole town of New Iberia needs to get a life.......Drama, Drama, Drama........they know nothing else.......they are like animals .........with no brains......wake up and act like human beings... "

    Great Gobbledegook wrote on Jul 28, 2009 12:37 AM:

    " To tell the truth, truth or dare, truth or consequences, who's truth, what in the wide world of sports is a goin' on in this forum? One has to laugh at this stuff. One post says the sheriff and the deputies will have to go it alone if they don't get on board with the parents. Whaaaaaat!? A parent isn't a label on a baby mama. At the very least it is a learned activity from birth by observation of a descent upbringing. No police can make that happen it starts at home with/caring/concerned/people. "

    Out of the Crowd wrote on Jul 28, 2009 12:21 AM:

    " I can usually spot them a mile away. The writer going by what is the truth has got to be a disgruntled employee. Or rather a once upon a time employee. Listen don't carry a grudge not everyone can be a law man/woman. It's just not something normal people do to earn a living. Yeah I said it. Cops have to be crazy to risk everything for totally ungrateful people. Just think of yourself as a normal human being and go out and live your normal life. Stop worrying about the Sheriff--He-gunna-be-jus-fine-Cher. "

    THE REAL TRUTH wrote on Jul 27, 2009 3:55 PM:

    " And if you ask Cheif Robicheaux if he has been asked to come out of retirement, I'm sure he would set you straight and tell you that he enjoys his job and that this is the best administration he has ever worked for. Once again, you have NO IDEA what your talking about.

    "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt" . -- George Eliot "

    THE REAL TRUTH wrote on Jul 27, 2009 3:49 PM:

    " As far as the radio system, ask the parish council. Last time I checked the Office of Homeland Security is under their authority. And the Office of Homeland Security controls the Communicatios District of Iberia Parish, police, fire...etc. They get all the federal and state funding, so ask them where the new and improved radio system is. Then ask them how well it works in Iberia Parish and you will find that it is still in the research and developement mode. Why, because State Police doesn't work wrecks in the City. Next? "

    THE REAL TRUTH wrote on Jul 27, 2009 3:45 PM:

    " "provide these parents some assistance" ARE YOU KIDDING ME? PROVIDE THESE PARENTS SOME ASSISTANCE? When I was growing up my parents PROVIDED me the ASSISTANCE I NEEDED. They made sure that I was home when I wassuppose to be, doing my home work when I was suppose to, using my manors when I was suppose to. AND KICKING MY *(& WHEN IT NEEDED IT. Since when is a Sheriff responsible for raising YOUR KIDS? The sheriff's office is resposisble to protect us from YOUR KIDS. GET A GRIP, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM! "

    What is theTruth wrote on Jul 27, 2009 12:23 PM:

    " Lastly, you have given me the new excuse Ackal will be using to explain why he is not providing the services he promised during the election. It’s the parents fault. Wake up and smell the coffee! Ask any Sheriff or Chief of Police what age group commits the majority of the crime in their jurisdiction and they will tell you juveniles. Until Ackal takes the initiative to get involved with the community and provide these parents some assistance, his Deputies and him will have to fight this battle alone! "

    What is the Truth wrote on Jul 27, 2009 12:20 PM:

    " I have never questioned the salaries of the commissioned deputies or the cost of the necessary equipment, like new patrol cars, vests, computers for these Deputies. Actually, I would like to ask why Ackal hasn’t provided these Deputies with the new radio system that is currently being used by all law enforcement agencies. I am sure Ackal will say it is Hebert’s fault, but Ackal has been in office for over a year and has borrowed and been given millions of dollars. Is he really concerned about the safety of his own Deputies? "

    What is the Truth wrote on Jul 27, 2009 11:53 AM:

    " Ackal has increased the salaries of the Deputies, bought them new units and vest, but the younger Deputies are leaving in the same buses used during the Hebert administration. What is lacking? LEADERSHIP. They see the Sheriff at the incidents covered by the news media (doesn’t this sound familiar), but like the public, they do not see him otherwise. They do hear the stories about his escapades at a local eatery on Main Street, but that is nothing to be proud of. Has his supervisors been sent to a Leadership school? "

    What is the Truth wrote on Jul 27, 2009 11:50 AM:

    " I totally agree with you that Hebert was, “…GONE OFF THE RADAR”, during the LAST year of his term. Ackal, in his FIRST year of his term, cannot be found 90% of the time. Ackal has been quoted that he prefers to work when no one is at the courthouse. What is Ackal scared of? Since Ackal’s Chief Criminal Deputies also refuses to speak to the public, Ackal had to ask Mr. Earl to come out of his retirement and spend 3 days or more to listen to the public’s complaints. "

    angel wrote on Jul 27, 2009 7:45 AM:

    " Look at the comment Ackal made about the Gauthier Case " Ex-Cop Accused of Rape!!!!" "

    Real Truth is Hilarious-cont wrote on Jul 26, 2009 10:24 PM:

    " The level of law enforcement you speak of is only in numbers. How could Ackal put those numbers on the street? Money. Paying outragous salaries for under-educated is no big feat. Giving a NON-POST certified admin flunkie a brand new charger is no big feat either. Of course they'll come running in for a job. Of course since we're talking about the "level" of law enforcement, how about the "level" of spending. We have never had a sheriff provide this level of "spending" before either. Too bad he couldn't keep the girlfriends son away-from-his-crack-rentals. Oh-well-,just-find-a-new-relative-to-run-the-mechanics-shop.Maybe-now-there-won't-be-any-pillheads-being-fed-inside-anymore. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 26, 2009 10:18 PM:

    " to: The real truth is:

    You raise some valid points. I am sure that there are many on the police force who care about their job and want to do what is right. But you have many of you who abuse your power, violate peoples rights, whine about junky cars, and generally harass the general public.

    You could focus on improving community relations and getting your message, as stated in your posts, to the people.

    Most people don't believe you. "

    Real Truth is Hilarious wrote on Jul 26, 2009 10:13 PM:

    " You talk about the deputies like they have no other option. I'll buy them a cup of joe and thank them when I see one of them do what they are paid to do. No one said they don't have a tough job. Of course, no one is holding them there. They are free to move on to get a better paying job or one less dangeous. You sign up, then just do your job, simple. I did't ask them to miss their football, baseball or dance recitals. That's THEIR choice to do the job. So-stop-with-all-the self-pity-and-belly-aching. Wipe-your-nose-and-go-do-what-you-are-paid-to-do. "

    THE REAL TRUTH IS wrote on Jul 26, 2009 11:01 AM:

    " THE REAL TRUTH IS there is not one Sheriff's Deputy that reports to duty and thinks to himself, I think I will let someone get killed today. They don't sit around eating donuts hoping that someone gets robbed. They put that uniform on with pride and do the best job they can. And thanks to SHERIFF LOUIS ACKAL, they have the best equipment to do it with, so they can get home to their families too. So instead of complaining about them, buy them a cup of Coffee and Thank Them. "

    THE REAL TRUTH IS wrote on Jul 26, 2009 10:54 AM:

    " THE REAL TRUTH IS that the Sheriff's Deputies and their families read your crap about them and their department after they have been up all night protecting your butt. Away from their homes, missing their kids football games, baseball games or dancing reviews. Putting their lives on the line everyday, doing the best job they can for you. But you have the nerve to get on this forum and say terrible things about them and their leadership. If you lost your job when Ackal won, that was a year ago, move on. "

    THE REAL TRUTH IS wrote on Jul 26, 2009 10:47 AM:

    " THE REAL TRUTH IS this City has never seen the level of Law Enforcement that is here now. There are a certain few that write on this forum just to keep the pot stired. These few have dilutions of granger. They think if the Police Department comes back, they will be the next Chief, Assistant Chief or Major. This group doesn't care about the facts, they only want to "BE IN CHARGE" of something. Do some home work. WAKE UP!!! Do you remember what the police dept was like before? Want it Back? "

    THE REAL TRUTH IS wrote on Jul 26, 2009 10:37 AM:

    " THE REAL TRUTH IS most of the drug dealing, stealing and violent crime that occurs in the City is being done by the YOUTH of New Iberia. Under the direction of older family members. That is right, the juveniles are out there stealing and dealing because they believe that they can't go to prison because they are too young. If you want to blame someone for the crime in New Iberia, blame the parents. The Sheriff's Office can't stop someone from mudering another no more that they can know when your going to read this. "

    THE REAL TRUTH IS wrote on Jul 26, 2009 10:33 AM:

    " THE REAL TRUTH is this that some deputies could have practically qualifed for food stamps, but they still went to work everday to protect the likes of you. You weren't there, don't pretend to know what the *&$% your talking about. The $50,000.00 being spent to do a study is what the MAYOR wants. And to be honest with you, the Sheriff's Office would be in a lot better shape if the city would get its own Police Department. 90% of the violent crime comes from within the city. So she deserves it back. "

    THE REAL TRUTH IS wrote on Jul 26, 2009 10:29 AM:

    " The REAL TRUTH is that the Sheriff's Office was in such bad shape, no one would work there. People were leaving in bus loads to work some place where there were units to drive, bullet proof vest to wear and leadership. The Sheriff's Office was so under staffed that Narcotics and Detectives were taken off the road and made to work patrol. There were very few days off and the cars were in such bad shape that it was amazing that no one was hurt or killed driving this junk. Some of these cars had 300,000 miles. "

    THE REAL TRUTH IS wrote on Jul 26, 2009 10:24 AM:

    " HEBERT didn't threaten to abandon the people of Iberia Parish, Hebert DID ABANDON the people of Iberia the Deputies of the Iberia parish Sheriff's Office. Long before the election, Hebert was GONE OFF OF THE RADAR. He was unable to be found 90% of the time. He walked out and left the office manager to run the Sheriff's Office while he did what ever he did and David Landry ran for Sheriff. So don't tell me about what a great job Sid did. Obviously you weren't there when this was going on. Ask the Deputies. "

    What is the Truth wrote on Jul 25, 2009 3:11 PM:

    " The City Council DID NOT agree that the contract was invalid and unreasonable. With Ackal’s threats and their commitment to the taxpayers of this City, the City Council gave Ackal what he wanted monetarily. If they totally agreed with Ackal, why did they approved the spending of $50,000 for a study to determine the feasibility of bring back the New Iberia Police Department? They are well aware that Ackal can return next year and again threatened them for more money. It seems Ackal’s only method of negotiating is to threaten the lives of the people who-elected-him. "

    What is the Truth wrote on Jul 25, 2009 3:08 PM:

    " The TRUTH of the matter is the contracts failed under Ackal and not Hebert. I do not recall Hebert threatening to abandon the jail and the City unless the governing bodies gave him more money. The people are not questioning the purchase of patrol cars, but are questioning the number of patrol cars and the large number of unmarked cars, many of which were used by administrative staff to go to and from work. They also question why local dealerships were not allowed to bid on the unmarked cars. Is the answer they did not support Ackal? "

    THE TRUTH wrote on Jul 24, 2009 12:41 PM:

    " The TRUTH is that both the City Council and the Parish Council AGREED that the contracts were invaild and unreasonable. They AGREED that they were not paying what they should have been paying. The only one who didn't agree was the Mayor, and she still thinks we need a Convention Center where there is no parking and no one will use. She also takes advice on Police matters from someone who has little or no Police experience. Absolutely no Command or adminstrative experience. But then you already know this don't you? "

    THE TRUTH wrote on Jul 24, 2009 12:31 PM:

    " The truth is that the former Sheriff agreed to contracts that were destin to fail. Then, when he realized that he could not operate under these contracts because there was no possible way to pay his bills and maintain his equipment. Which was obvious to MOST of the public just by looking a the old State Police cars he bought with 80,000 + miles on them, which by the way where not purchased in the parish either, He RAN AWAY AS FAST AS POSSIBLE. Did you see the inside of the jail on the news? WAKE UP! "

    What is the TRUTH wrote on Jul 24, 2009 9:58 AM:

    " What is the TRUTH? When he took office, Ackal accused the former Sheriff of not spending the money he received from the Parish Council on the jail. Ackal further stated he was in the process of doing a forensic audit to determine where the former Sheriff spent the money.
    Last month, Ackal threatened to not honor the contract he had with the Parish Council if the Parish Council did not give him more money to operate the jail. The TRUTH of the matter is Ackal is no better, if not worse, than the former Sheriff. "

    ARE YOU KIDDING ME wrote on Jul 23, 2009 9:54 AM:

    " TRUTH, TRUTH What the heck would any of you know about the TRUTH. Infact, give me a good example of ONE good thing that has come from lies and speculation that has been written on this forum. But you admit that there is a group of people that have organized themselves to personally attack the reputation of people within the department, their superviors, they can't control. Please, go home! If you were such a good employee, you'd be working right now instead of writting these lies. I pity you, living with such low self esteem. "

    ARE YOU KIDDING ME wrote on Jul 23, 2009 9:49 AM:

    " TRUTH, TRUTH What the heck would any of you know about the TRUTH. Infact, give me a good example of ONE good thing that has come from lies and speculation that has been written on this forum. So you admit that there is a group of people that have organized themselves to personally attack the reputation of people within the department, their superviors, they can't control. Please, go home! If you were such a good employee, you'd be working right now instead of writting these lies. I pity you, living with such low self esteem. "

    To Nothing but Trash wrote on Jul 23, 2009 8:23 AM:

    " Do you really want these employees to leave? There are several employees, who have already left, informing the public of questionable activities that have occurred at the Sheriff’s Office since Ackal took office. If what they say is true, Ackal should have saved that money to pay off the lawsuit(s) that will be filed in the future. One of the employees who allegedly received the raise, who is an “asset” to the department, supposedly had a lawsuit filed against him for similar allegations in another state. I guess Ackal doesn’t do background checks on his friends. "

    Funny how that works wrote on Jul 22, 2009 6:39 PM:

    " Lets see, you mean if you take a check from someone you should be LOYAL and effective as a employee. My guess is that you can trace it back to a select few employees who are not happy because THEY think THEY should be running the SHERIFF"S OFFICE. Just because you can walk the streets and help campaign doesn't make you entitled or qualified to be an administrator or even a policeman. Shake that trash off your shoes Sheriff, we got your back. You know who they are. Get on the team, or get GONE!!! "

    YOU SAID IT BROTHER wrote on Jul 22, 2009 6:27 PM:

    " It is about time someone said this out load. It is one thing to sit on the side lines and run your mouth. But when your taking a check from the same guy your running in the ground.... Well that is another. Looks to me like the two people who got a raise in pay, if they really did, must have been considered assets to the department. On the other hand, the cry baby must have been sent downstairs in the basement or home because he or she didn't do what they needed to. "

    Nothing but Trash wrote on Jul 22, 2009 4:44 PM:

    " There is nothing that makes my stomach turning faster than listening to some disloyal employee, cry baby, whinning *$%. If you are so unhappy with the way the sheriff is running his office, you need to pack your desk, go to your house, and take your relatives with you. Please do not force yourself to take money from a man who you can't stand. If you don't work there, it is obvious that you are getting your information from someone who does. And you can believe it won't take long to figure it out. "

    What do they think.. wrote on Jul 22, 2009 9:56 AM:

    " I wonder what the city council thinks about Louis giving an $8,000 raise to 2 administrators at the courthouse after having gotten more money from them? Looks like the useless spending continues! The parish too will fall victim to the same threats year in and year out as long as Louis is in office. He citizens, get ready a TAX proposition is coming and Louis will NOT be the one that asks for it. It will be the City or the parish that will be forced to do the DIRTY WORK! "

    To Dont Know wrote on Jul 20, 2009 9:38 AM:

    " Why do you insist on putting the cart before the horses. The Deputies need the assistance of the public to make this a better place to live. You readily admitted the Community Policing done by the NIPD was successful because the officers knew the people on a personal level. The Deputies need to take the initiative to get the public involved. They need to go out of their way to meet the people in the areas that they are having problems and convince these people to start a Neighborhood Watch or Walking Patrol program. "

    Dont Know wrote on Jul 19, 2009 11:45 AM:

    " D. Hertz it's quite obvious you're a whinner by reading your posts. Your like a little girl that got her pigtail pulled. Listen man why don't you do something for your community beside whine about what you believe are the shortfalls of others. I don't believe you're even from New Iberia but nonetheless you can still do something for your community by maybe starting a neighborhood watch program. Heck you can even start up a walking patrol. Observe and report. But you won't you'd rather criticize those that would risk their lives for-you. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 17, 2009 10:19 PM:

    " This is getting ridiculous. You cops first blame Sid Hebert for your shortfalls. Then you blame old junky cars and equipment. Then you blame lack of money.

    Now you are saying law enforcement is the responsibility of the community.

    I have heard of passing the buck but this takes the cake.

    Why don't you try just doing your job. "

    Dont Know wrote on Jul 17, 2009 5:57 PM:

    " The community policing initiative with NIPD came from officers who new the people on a personal level. That took decades. It's been five years since the hostile take over occurred. Five more years will be a decade. Maybe some community links will occur by then. Who really knows, the city might have a new police department by then and we can start all over again. Ask the council I think they have an idea about what they're trying to accomplish. Meanwhile I believe IPSO will continue to clean up New Iberia's re'fuse. "

    To Dont Know wrote on Jul 17, 2009 11:28 AM:

    " Crime prevention starts with the law enforcement agency. The officers have to take the initiative to make contacts within the community. At one time, it was referred to as Community Policing. The New Iberia Police Department was successful in getting grants to develop Community Policing throughout the city.
    Of course, Sheriff Ackal has cried several times about him not being eligible for grants, therefore, there is no financial benefits for him to initiate a Community Policing in the west side of New Iberia. Generally, police cannot solve a crime without the assistance of the community. "

    Dont Know wrote on Jul 17, 2009 12:39 AM:

    " Once again Reule, crime prevention starts with the people of New Iberia. No matter who the sheriff or mayor is. More often than not the police are only the clean up crew to pick up the criminal after the mess they leave. It is rare that criminals are foiled before they do their dirty deeds. Once again you're looking for the man with the S on his chest to predict crime before it happens. If you open your eyes you'll see the criminals are not getting away. Ackal is doing the job. "

    I dont want to be like you either wrote on Jul 16, 2009 9:17 PM:

    " No D.Hertz, I was just thanking the IPSO for the job they did. No politics,no hate, just a common citizen appreciating good law enforcement. Thank you again IPSO and to the men and women who serve. Now goodby Mr. Hertz,I give back the domain of stupidity. Why would anybody want to live here? "

    Like I said before wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:01 PM:

    " Please not another State Trooper for Sheriff.The last two was a big disapointment. "

    Reule Broussard wrote on Jul 16, 2009 11:54 AM:

    " to: Dont Know:

    To answer your first question, because Ackal promissed to clean up crime.

    So now, crime is NOT Ackal's problem, it is the citizens' problem.

    Ackal made big ole promisses of lower crime and doing it cheaper.

    You cops are trying to talk out of both sides of your mouths.

    If that young man would have been packing a gun, the scenario would have been a whole lot different. There would have been a cry about a white guy shooting two black guys. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 15, 2009 8:30 PM:

    " To: "we are not all like them"

    What does that mean? Are you saying some of the cops try and uphold the law and others let stuff slide? That says a lot about the internal divisions within the department.

    You guys should find one good person to run for sheriff and all get behind him/her. "

    To C. Douglas wrote on Jul 15, 2009 7:45 PM:

    " Murphy Meyers would make a great sheriff, but the only problem is that he lives in St. Martin Parish. "

    Dont Know wrote on Jul 15, 2009 7:17 PM:

    " Reule you have a belief system that is dysfunctional. Why would Sheriff Ackal be the person to have to clean up Deare Street? It seems you're part of the group that can't accept responsibility for themselves. Deare Street, just as many other parts of New Iberia have been a problem long before Mr. Ackal came along. It's no secret check the criminal files. What's missing isn't a deputy driving up and down Deare Street it's community morality and involvement. Therein lies New Iberia's biggest problem. It can change starting with you today. "

    we are not all like them wrote on Jul 15, 2009 6:19 PM:

    " While the complaining goes on I saw on KATC broke up a cocaine making ring on Brenda Drive with several arrest. Was that in the DI? Thank you IPSO for efforts to make our parish safe. "Those that make you believe absurdities will make you commit atrocities" Voltaire. "

    I agree wrote on Jul 15, 2009 12:48 PM:

    " I agree with Reule, Ackal said that he could provide "Better" Law Enforcement for "Cheaper". He has done neither! So far, he has managed to get the City Council to give him millions and he will next get $500,000 from the Parish Council. The only thing I see with Ackal is his ability "Manage" how to throw a temper tantrum. His ability to manage a budget is non-existant! "

    C. Douglas Godwin wrote on Jul 15, 2009 11:46 AM:

    " Murphy Meyers would get my vote. He truly has a "protect and serve" attitude. He is extremely congenial to people, has extraordinary law enforcement skills and the personality to "glue" the community together to make us safer.

    Next time I see him, I too will encourage him to run. "

    rosehill lady wrote on Jul 15, 2009 11:16 AM:

    " murphy meyers would be a great sheriff, we need to encourage him to retire from the state police and start campaigining, and besides murphy has the outgoing personality to get along with people, we all need to stand behind murphy and approach him to run for sheriff, let's do it "

    Reule Broussard wrote on Jul 15, 2009 9:33 AM:

    " To: Dont Know:

    Thanks for your unsolicited advise with the condescending attitude.

    The problem, is that a lot of these posters have a hint of belief that Ackal may just be wearing tights under his clothes, just waiting to find a phone booth to turn into superman.

    When was the last patrol on Dear Street before this young man was murdered?

    What efforts has Ackal done to slow the crime in this area?

    What plan does Ackal have to address the Deare Street area crime? "

    Dont Know wrote on Jul 15, 2009 12:09 AM:

    " Mr. Reule how do you stop a fool from doing foolish things? Do you believe Sheriff Ackal is a mind reader able to predict when the criminal element is going to strike? There was only one person like that and he wore a red cape with a big S on the front of his shirt. Now there's a ferry tale you might believe in also. Truth be known you are the person that's going to protect yourself. Don't put yourself in riskly positions and you'll be OK. Now enjoy your life and don't believe-in-ferry-tales. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:20 PM:

    " To GuynLaf:

    I don't think for one minute that the comments posted on this forum have anything to do with out of control crime in Iberia, assuming that the crime is out of control.

    A few people simply airing their opinions and thoughts on a newspaper forum is NOT the cause of crime in Iberia.

    Remenber, guns don't kill people, bullets do. "

    JoLisa M wrote on Jul 13, 2009 9:46 PM:

    " I loved in New Iberia in the 1960s, 70s and my husband was on the NIPD. What happened to the police department? I notice everything is the Sheriff's Dept now. I'll keep checking back for an answer as I'm really curious. I loved New Iberia and didn't want to leave it, but man has it changed! "

    Reule Broussard wrote on Jul 13, 2009 3:25 PM:

    " Safer now that Ackal is Sheriff? He didn't stop that poor young man from getting beaten to death, nor the 13 year from getting killed, etc.

    I don't feel any safer since Ackal came in. "

    GuynLaf wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:40 PM:

    " All of you, residents of Iberia Parish that chose to bash and criticize the other's choice of Sheriff of Iberia Parish, should be ashamed of yourselves. Yes, each and every one of you! I don't live in your Parish, but I do read the local news and for months and months now, I've read over and over again the columns and postings criticizing both Sheriff Ackal and former Sheriff Romero. Could all of this bickering and fighting be part of the cause of the out of control crime in the City of New Iberia? It certainly doesn'thelp. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 13, 2009 12:48 PM:

    " To DeWayne:

    Your comments sound like they are coming from a drama queen. You act like Iberia Parish was the wild wild west and "Ackal the Great" showed up and now we can all live in peace and harmony forever.

    My nighttime getting out habits have not changed since Ackal the Great arrived. I don't feel REALLY safe now Ackal is at the controls.

    You people are in the ozone if you think the rest of us are breathing giant sighs of relief JUST because Ackal is in town.

    Get real coppers, grow up. "

    To Dewayne wrote on Jul 13, 2009 9:35 AM:

    " The only zero I saw was Ackal's fund balance on June 30. Unlike you, I do not have friends and family members that are criminals. My neighborhood? We feel secure at night. Of course, we felt secure at night when Hebert was Sheriff. How many times do we see a Deputy patrolling our neighborhood? Maybe once every 6 months, the same as when Hebert was Sheriff. Of course, when Hebert was Sheriff, I didn’t have to worry about my taxes going up!! "

    DeWayne wrote on Jul 12, 2009 6:55 PM:

    " You people who obviously would rather have a (0) zero as a sheriff like the prior one than a person who does his best to keep everyone including you safe need to stop your complaining and get on board to help him. Your probably afraid to get out of your houses at night because of crime in your neighborhood but rather than help him clean it up you don't want to turn your friends and family members in for their crimes. If you don't help in the solutions to crime you're part of the problem. "

    been there done that wrote on Jul 12, 2009 1:55 AM:

    " another possible sheriff candidate is murphy meyers. he should retire from the state police before the next election and has years of leadership experience at the sheriff's department under wattigny and romero. "

    Shooting from the hip wrote on Jul 12, 2009 12:42 AM:

    " Once again what the people of New Iberia vote for means nothing to the elected leadership. Didn't the voters choose to have the Iberia Parish Sheriff provide law enforcement for the city of New Iberia? I think that is a resounding yes. Why waste 50 grand studying something the voters will have to vote out in order to bring back a police department? Just put it back in front of the voters. They'll vote for the sheriff again. Let the voters resolve the issue. The council will have to abide this time. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 11, 2009 3:26 PM:

    " I thought so. None of you are tuff enuf. The only time you are tuff is when you are scaring little ole ladies who run stop signs and tear off those mattress tags. "

    buz buz buz wrote on Jul 11, 2009 2:27 PM:

    " a sheriff is just an administrator who administrates the office of sheriff, and the way that this office is being run is getting way way out of hand, I think we need a LADY SHERIFF, who about that little lady, I think her name is Kitty somethign, she might be good, seen her around the courthouses working in reseach, what do you think?????????? "

    Gordon wrote on Jul 11, 2009 8:42 AM:

    " With all this miraculous wisdom and insight out there, its amazing none of YOU have run for an office. Judging by your solutions it should be no problem for the self proclaimed economists, and business majors. LOL

    Took you a little while to jump in the argument Hertz, but I see you made it....LOL "

    i WANT PAYBACK wrote on Jul 10, 2009 8:47 PM:

    " I agree with you D. Hertz, I will folow you. Recognize yourself like a true leader and I am with you. I swear I didn't do what they fired me for at IPSO. "

    Didnt Sheriff Ackal say wrote on Jul 10, 2009 6:25 PM:

    " when he was campaigning that he could run the department better AND cheaper than Sid? "

    feel free to re-apply wrote on Jul 10, 2009 5:28 PM:

    " Sorry the job interview with the Sheriff didn't work out D. Hertz. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 9, 2009 10:11 PM:

    " Why don't some of you cops who are disgusted with Ackal consider running against him.

    I can't believe that all the deputies who work for Ackal are wholeheartdly supporting his every decision.

    Come on guys, come out and be recognized. "

    A citizen wrote on Jul 9, 2009 10:51 AM:

    " How about a real person in office. Someone who has never worked in office before.Doesn't know anyone in the police department to play favortism.Someone who cares what our town state country and world is coming to.How about me.I am a single mother of 5 girls.I bet I can run all this with a lesser budget than what they were given.And I wouldn't threaten to take our police off the streets.If you are going to make crime rate go down then you cannot take our officers off the streets. "

    to Steven wrote on Jul 9, 2009 9:32 AM:

    " Joey Sturm is NOT a good choice! If you think Ackal throws temper tantrums you've haven't seen Joey Sturm. His ego is BIGGER that Ackal's too! If Joey Sturm would run, his closet has baggage which may surprise many! "

    My taughts wrote on Jul 9, 2009 5:13 AM:

    " I can think of a few names for sheriff but the list is topped by Darrel Gros. I never worked with him, for him, whatever but I've spoken to him while he worked at the S.O. and I believe he is a true gentleman and professional. Now, whether or not he has the inclination, energy, or gumption is another page. Stay tuned. "

    Steven wrote on Jul 8, 2009 10:08 PM:

    " To taxpayer,
    Vic for Sheriff. Maybe 30 years ago. I'm not sure of his age, but he's closer to becoming a pope than a sheriff.

    And one other thing with Louis Ackal. I think he has helped crime quite a bit in the city, but it's still awful.

    I think the scary part is all the contracts that were renegotiated for items that may not have not been needed just wanted. There is mumbling in New Iberia about kickbacks and whether its true or not it's just not good for the ctiy. "

    Steven wrote on Jul 8, 2009 9:44 PM:

    " We need to go back to a police dept. Crime in New Iberia has been out of control for way too long. Now we know why Sid "quit and stayed" for at least 2 years before the last election.

    We need to go and get someone like Joey Sturm (NI native and currently heads up the UL UPs) to come back and head up the department.

    Ruth Fontenot killed this city. We pay way way way too much for water and crime is out of control. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 8, 2009 9:12 PM:

    " To tiger96: I think you have to recall the sheriff by circulating a petition with a certain number of names. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 8, 2009 9:11 PM:

    " A lady sheriff? Who cares if the sheriff is male or female? Lets just get someone who knows what a budget is and understands basic math.

    Female candidates: Ruth Fontenot, Hilda Curry, Maggie Daniels, Sally Angers, Faye Gray, Roberta Boudreaux "

    be real wrote on Jul 8, 2009 7:30 PM:

    " Bobby Jackson? Be real folks. Manage a 5 million dollar budget? No Murphy Painter did that! Lead his ATC men? No they loved him because he was never there to make them do any work and they had a ball all day at the taxpayers expense. This guy could not keep a job under Romo because of some questionable time sheets. Go try to sell it somewhere else cause those of us who know the truth are laughing. "

    BAM wrote on Jul 8, 2009 6:33 PM:

    " Any of you ladies out there interested in
    doing some sherrif'n? Please feel free to
    contact me on this forum for an initial enterview. Those of you who have potential will be rescheduled for follow up enterviews. Good luck and may the
    best gal win. "

    police background is not what we want wrote on Jul 8, 2009 5:47 PM:

    " While it is premature to start throwing names about, I would like to postulate that the last person we want to run for sheiff is anyone with a police background. The Sheriff isn't a COP, he is an ADMINISTRATOR. He can hire all the police types that he (or she) needs. When the city brings back the PD, patrol will be a third of the Sheriffs operation at best. Two thirds will be tax collection, running the courts, and running the Jail. What we need is someone who CAN BALANCE A BUDGET while providing services. "

    To D.Hertz wrote on Jul 8, 2009 5:43 PM:

    " You are the only one saying that Jackson does not have broad appeal. I think Jackson done pretty good in the last election given that prior to that, no one knoew who he was and in comparison to the funding that Landry and Ackal had. "

    To Taxpayer wrote on Jul 8, 2009 5:24 PM:

    " You have a wonderful idea!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think Vic Delcambre would make a great sheriff. Someone needs to put the idea in Mr. Vic's head. Come on and give us your opinions about this. I would support Mr. vic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

    tiger96 wrote on Jul 8, 2009 4:09 PM:

    " Can we "impeach" the sheriff? I need to start a recall petition like yesterday! Ms. Mayor, I would have pledged my vote to you in perpetuity if you had called Jindal on his bluff! They entered into a contract & should be held accountable for it. Ackal needs to cut costs if his revenues aren't covering the expenses. Governor, work on balancing your budget & maybe Ackal can get a clue. "

    to the ladies wrote on Jul 8, 2009 4:05 PM:

    " HOW about a lady sheriff? "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 8, 2009 3:37 PM:

    " Does anyone else have an original thought, besides Jackson? Gee whiz, with over 30,000 people in the parish, you think we could come up with a few more names other than Action Jackson and LeBanc.

    It is obvious that Jackson does not have broad appeal. "

    Taxpayer wrote on Jul 7, 2009 2:17 PM:

    " I'd like to throw a name in the mix for the next Sheriff, how about the current City Marshal, Vic Delcambre, he has 30 years of experience, and thinks he's doing a great job! Match his experience to Mr. Jacksons. That would be an even race!!! "

    for the record wrote on Jul 7, 2009 12:58 PM:

    " Jackson was in the intellegence division of the military...don't know where you guys get that he was a leader during the Iraq war. He was stationed in Kwaitt. Get your facts straight. "

    D. Hertz for Sheriff wrote on Jul 7, 2009 10:19 AM:

    " I think that D. Hertz should run for Sheriff. He has an opinion on EVERYTHING...
    SInce he thinks that everyone else is not capable enough, smart enough, experienced enough, etc. let's see how well he would do.
    How about it Mr. Hertz? Will you put your name into the running, or just criticize everyone else from the safety of your computer? "

    To High noon wrote on Jul 7, 2009 10:01 AM:

    " Jackson has led men who put thier lives on the line daily for most of his life. As an officer in the military and also as a cop. He commanded the state ATC and commanded the Sheriff's Criminal Investigations Division "

    Bill wrote on Jul 6, 2009 11:03 PM:

    " Well, I will vote for Jackson should he decide to run. I think that he has the right mixture of experience to be a good sheriff. He has military, law enforcement and administrative experience. Having law enforcement (40 years as some claim) is not getting us anywhere. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 6, 2009 10:38 PM:

    " Actually, I was joking about Shoe Do Lewis. Well actually, he is a joke.

    Randy Boullion is some sort of commander in the IPSO. I heard a friend of mine speak very highly of him as an outstanding officer and highly respected leader. I can't vouch for him personally.

    I was just trying to think outside the "Action Jackson" and "Now's the Time LeBlanc" box. "

    High Noon wrote on Jul 6, 2009 7:09 PM:

    " To whomever posted to High Noon I must tell you there is no way I could work for a police officer's wage nor the issue that people just don't like cops. It's called struggling for people who aren't quite sure if they even want to be protected. As for Mr. Jackson perhaps I spoke a little hastily. I really don't know what credentials he brings to the table to lead men who put their lives on the line daily. Could he gather enough respect from real men to lead them? The public said no. "

    To D.Hertz wrote on Jul 6, 2009 5:01 PM:

    " Please not another state trooper .The last two will be enough for a life time. "

    interesting wrote on Jul 6, 2009 9:57 AM:

    " D. Hertz,
    I also wanted to tell you that you have a good idea when you name former state policeman, Darrly Gros for sheriff. I do not know Randy Boullion so I can't say anything regarding that person. I also do not think this parish.city needs Ruth Fontenot as our sheriff either. I really like the idea of Mr. Gros running for that position and I think he would run a very good race. "

    interesting wrote on Jul 6, 2009 9:53 AM:

    " D. Hertz,
    Shoe-Do Lewis for sheriff. OOOhhhhhhhhhh please, do not go putting ideas in this mans head. He creates enough problems as it is. He also does not know how to speak and say anything that amounts to anything. He just rambles on and on about himself. Please do not try and curse this parish/city with such an idea. I beg you not to do this. Thanks. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 5, 2009 2:39 PM:

    " I find it hard to believe that Jackson is the only qualified person to run against Ackal. Personally I am tired of reading the Jackson debate, it is going nowhere.

    How about some other peope? Former State Trooper Darrell Gros, former mayor Ruth Fontenot, Randy Boullion, Shoe Do Lewis. "

    Just a thought wrote on Jul 5, 2009 2:31 PM:

    " Maybe if the city council could put this issue up for vote again,and let the voters settle this issue once and for all we can put this horriable mess behind us .Ms.Hilda,MR. Decourt ,Ms Segura,Shoe-Do,remember the blue ribbon commitee?You all were in favor of getting the NIPD back.That was the platform you all ran on.I for one does not think it is a good idea for one person to be in charge of all law inforcement in this city and parish.there are no checks and balance here. Just a thought "

    To High Noon continued wrote on Jul 5, 2009 12:50 PM:

    " You seem to have a problem with people who don't agree with you. I think you and a few others who keep commenting are afraid if Bobby Jackson becomes the sheriff you would be out of a job. The NIPD was disbanned because of a few bad cops and it has now become Sheriff's Ackal's problem because he hired a few of you. So High Noon if you want to keep posting at least be smart enough not to give yourself away by your own postings. And tell the truth for once. "

    To High Noon wrote on Jul 5, 2009 12:39 PM:

    " After studing your posts I have come to the conclusion that you work for Sheriff Ackal and you are a past employee of the NIPD. How do you know D. Hertz has not called the Sheriff's Office unless you have access? You say Bobby Jackson is not a leader of men under the badge but yet you have never worked for him. You people say Bobby Jackson hasn't held a job for long periods of time but fell to mention its because he kept getting promoted. You also fell to mention that he handled a 5 million dollar budget whenheworkedforthestate. "

    To Taxpayer wrote on Jul 5, 2009 12:27 PM:

    " You say its easy to serve in the military for 20 yrs when there is no war. During the past 20 yrs (while Bobby Jackson was in the Army) we had 3 wars. And as per your own statement you said Bobby Jackson was in Iraq when he hurt his back. So as per your own comment Bobby Jackson was off fighting in a war. As for him not being on the front line it might have something to do with his rank as a Major in the Army. That's something you have never accomplished. "

    To Taxpayer wrote on Jul 4, 2009 2:31 PM:

    " Whats the deal with all of you Jackson haters? Why all of the negitive comments? Falling fron his bunk? Where did you get that from? You Ackal supporters should be greatful for Jackson, you wouldn't have won the election without him. "

    Taxpayer wrote on Jul 4, 2009 10:02 AM:

    " This is to a nother taxpayer. Putting 20 years in the military is easy when there is no war going. I undertand Jackson got a medical discharge in Iraq when he hurt his back by falling out of his bunk. There are brave men and women being shot and killed, and he was discharged for falling from his bunk. Sounds like a croc to me!!! "

    John Burton wrote on Jul 3, 2009 5:01 PM:

    " I know Louis Ackal personally. I can assure you that Louis is an honest man who is doing his best to serve you. "

    High Noon wrote on Jul 3, 2009 1:30 PM:

    " I find it very interesting someone posted Mr. Bobby Jackson can't seem to lie, steal and cheat like Mr. Ackal and Mr. Landry. On the night Mr. Ackal was elected sheriff I watched him give Mr. Ackal a victory hug on channel three news. I also believe Mr. Jackson went to work for Mr. Ackal. I guess my question is if he thinks Mr. Ackal is and does all those things why did he help Mr. Ackal win the election? Mr. Jackson is a nice man but he is no leader for men under the badge. "

    High Noon wrote on Jul 3, 2009 1:23 PM:

    " To another tax payer. Do you really believe all the former NIPD officers care what happens to the city of new iberia? I'm sure those people have long moved on and probably out of Iberia Parish many many years ago and could care less if this town fell on it's ear. If you ever meet one of them you might ask them if it was a consolidation since they all lost their jobs cause Sid wouldn't hire them. I think the only consoldiation was the then mayor and the then sheriff, certainly nothing else. Voodoo combination. "

    taxpayer wrote on Jul 3, 2009 1:17 PM:

    " To high noon: You forget Jackson lied about running for city marshal. He told the DI he was running then never showed up at the starting gate. That make him out to be a liar, so now you would trust him after Ackal. NO WAY JOSE!! "

    Another taxpayer too wrote on Jul 3, 2009 1:10 PM:

    " Taxpayer, is that the best that you can do against Jackson? Wasn't he in the military for over 20 years? Didn't he work for the state for about 1o or so years? Thats keeping a job in my books!!!! "

    outside looking in wrote on Jul 3, 2009 11:20 AM:

    " Acakl is operating on the least amount of money than similar cities....Give him what he needs to do the JOB right.....Bringing back the NIPD will only bring back uneducated individuals with LOW pay and power trips who will do things like shoot people and ware the bullets around their neck as trophies or take pictures of dead children and circulate them around..... "

    To High Noon wrote on Jul 3, 2009 10:43 AM:

    " I agree with you about Jackson not being able to get elected, he just cannot seem to be able to lie, cheat and steal like those that do get elected. I think he would have done better in the last election if he would have lied like Ackal and Landry did. "

    another taxpayer wrote on Jul 3, 2009 9:21 AM:

    " It seems that some of the former NIPD is the ones that need cheese to go with the whine. They have been whining since the consolidation. "

    taxpayer wrote on Jul 2, 2009 8:42 PM:

    " There are a number of great ideas about Mr. Ackal, however, can't say that the last post boasting Bobby Jackson, is a good idea. Mr. Jackson can't decided what he wants to do and cannot hold a job for longer than a few months. What would he do for four year. Not the man for the job!! "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 2, 2009 7:49 PM:

    " The election for a new sheriff will be here before we know it. Ackal started campaigning 2 years before the 2007 election.

    Anybody but Ackal 2011. "

    High Noon wrote on Jul 2, 2009 6:32 PM:

    " D. Hertz you're looking to read reports as evidence crime is going down? The evidence is in the fact you aren't calling to make a report.

    IPSO V NIPD both are and were excellent organizations. The NIPD still exists as long as someone wears the NIPD badge as Liason. Now to bring the entire force back will be highly debated due to the tremendous costs. Would Mr. Bobby Jackson be a viable candidate as chief? It just depends on whether the position is an elected position or mayor's descretion. Bobby can't win an election. "

    MIL wrote on Jul 2, 2009 6:25 PM:

    " Herein lies the problem! Everybody wants to be sweet talked and men aren't men anymore like Sheriff Ackal. Get some REAL men in this town in this younger generation and you'll see crime cleaned up! "

    To IPSOvNIPD wrote on Jul 2, 2009 2:30 PM:

    " I think that former sheriff's candidate Bobby Jackson would be a great fit for police chief. He is younger, educated and seems to be calm and not so hot headed "

    IPSO vs NIPD wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:37 AM:

    " Regardless of who is providing law enforcement services, IPSO or NIPD, the workforce will consist mainly of ex-NIPD officers. The question that needs to be answered is who do we want to oversee the law enforcement services?
    Louis Ackal has over 30 years of experience in law enforcement, but obviously cannot manage a budget. Hilda Curry is fiscally responsible but has no law enforcement experience. Hilda Curry, however, can hire a Chief of Police, with the same amount of experience, but is younger and not so hot-headed. Bring back the NIPD! "

    scooter wrote on Jul 2, 2009 8:29 AM:

    " Y'all voted him in-y'all got what you deserved. "

    High Noon wrote on Jul 1, 2009 11:49 PM:

    " OK triple x which one of the magnificent duo are you? You can come out of the closet now the damage has been revealed. "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:46 PM:

    " Where the evidence of this so-called reduction in crime? All I hear are a bunch of Ackalites preaching that he is a great man, brought crime under control, keeps us safe, etc. Where are the reports for us common folk to look at? "

    xxx wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:54 AM:

    " High Noon, if we would have had a superior NIPD we would have wanted to keep it. Truth is they weren't any better!! A bunch that felt superior and above the law. They were not enforcing the law. "

    High Noon wrote on Jul 1, 2009 12:19 AM:

    " Do you guys want any cheese with that whine? Sometimes some people need to be spoken TO LOUDLY. They just can't seem to understand how serious a moment can be. For instance when you all voted against the NIPD in favor of the magnificent duo's inept plan to protect New Iberia citizens there was no problem. The plan was a failure just like the duo. You were told the next sheriff wouldn't operate by the failing sheriff's contract. Now you have to face it. So please have some cheese with your WHINE. SERIOUSLY! "

    Wayne Butler wrote on Jun 30, 2009 12:40 PM:

    " All of the cry babies forget about the poor service we got from Hebert. Last month Ackal made 50 drug arrests that I would say is more than Hebert made in 2 terms as sheriff. "

    WOW wrote on Jun 30, 2009 12:09 AM:

    " All I can say is WOW! Mr. Suire made the police leave the corner of Dale and Weeks St. He sure does have a lot of power. Maybe he should run for mayor but with all that power, governor would be more like it. "

    idiots wrote on Jun 29, 2009 10:19 PM:

    " Illiteracy is a terrible thing!! You morons need to do your homework before commenting on how the sheriff is running his department. Sid did it for less because HE DID NOTHING. The criminals ran this city and parish.
    If Hilda can do it for less why doesn't she do it. Maybe its because she does not want more headache for the same salary??? "

    A non believer wrote on Jun 29, 2009 10:13 PM:

    " Perhaps our dear sheriff should have thought about the money before he got into office and decided to spend. He commented on numerous occasion how "Sid Hebert did this, Sid Hebert did that". Well he is no better. His first order was to purchase new cars and not just any cars, he bought brand new chargers. Perhaps instead he should have spent money on paint and painted the old cars and used the rest of the money to take care of busy. Well, perhaps he should auction off the cars to get the money he. "

    Hearts wrote on Jun 29, 2009 1:13 PM:

    " Ackal has layed off part timers,to keep full timers on, now he has to pay the full timers insurance, if he would have kept the part timers he doesnt have to pay insurence on the part timers just the full timers.And they all can do the same job. "

    Hearts wrote on Jun 29, 2009 1:08 PM:

    " I think if Ackal wouldnt have redone the floors and brought in new desk and everything new, cars, uniforms, jackets,ect. Get rid of the dead beats. Like Mrs. Bruno, that scoops dog mess from Ackals dog at the couthouse,Mr. Toby Hebert, He would beable to budget his money and put it where its needed most "

    Miss Justice wrote on Jun 29, 2009 12:34 PM:

    " In the Sunday ad Louis failed to tell the public that those cities that are paying lots more money for their cops also have a big TAX going just to support the cops. Louis could have been honest but he lied. "

    Jimmy Fitzmorris wrote on Jun 29, 2009 9:08 AM:

    " Here's the lowdown for you Berryites..... Ackal has a lot of dead weight on his payroll. He's got folks on standby , waiting on Armageddon , getting paid $1'000 - $1'200 per month. Did you notice in his recent ad comparing hid dept. to others in the state, he dodn't list how many employees he has? No wonder his cries of not being able to make payroll are so loud , too many cronies to pay off. Open the books Louie! "

    to outraged wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:46 PM:

    " No Mr. Suire does not supply food for the sheriff's department. "

    law enforcement wrote on Jun 28, 2009 8:14 PM:

    " Great job Sheriff Ackal. Nice guys get washed away like snow in the rain. Keep doing your job sheriff. Heck with these nay sayers. "

    Ackal wrote on Jun 28, 2009 5:29 PM:

    " Before he started buying out of control. Why didn't he see if he could afford his high price buying? Now he is trying to get the Parish Council for more money for the jail. Why don't he make the inmates family pay their way in jail. Maybe they might help keep their family out of jail. Why should the taxpayers pay for inmates to live better then the ones who ain't in jail. I say turn off the ac ,Use fans, Get rid of all the enterainment they have and let them live like jailbirds they suppose to be. "

    MRS wrote on Jun 28, 2009 5:16 PM:

    " Well, I'm sure NOT ashamed of Sheriff Ackal, Freddie or Robert! Listen, there's NO bullying here! You get what you PAY for! You'll agree when Crime Comes Knocking at YOUR Door! Tell it like it IS Sheriff Ackal!! "

    chuck wrote on Jun 28, 2009 5:06 PM:

    " For all you people who have something negative to say about the sheriff and what hes is doing, remember this: Sid Hebert did nothing for you all nor for his people in the department. Acka,l in the last eleven months has turned has done more then Sid has done in the last ten years. If you people can not see that, then you are all blind or on some type of drug. Thank you Mr. Ackal, keep up the good work. "

    just me wrote on Jun 28, 2009 5:06 PM:

    " So Pandora's box has been opened, Ackel threatens, he gets what he wants. Look for him to ask for more in the next couple of months....and will probably get it again, because he will threaten again! He needs to hire a budget manager!!!!!!! "

    OneWhoKnows wrote on Jun 28, 2009 3:42 PM:

    " If some of you people would take a minute and check out the facts you would find out that Sheriff Ackal is caught between a rock and a hard place. He has been providing more than the contract pays for and the results have been great. Unfortunately, idiotic comments like yours do more harm than good. The Parish understands the problem. What is wrong with your Mayor? It's simple math. Law enforcement is expensive. Thats why your mayor pawned it off on the previous Sheriff in the first place. "

    me wrote on Jun 28, 2009 12:11 PM:

    " I think Mr. Suire is a joke. When the police dept was shooting radar on the corner of weeks and dale, he made them leave. Is this a man that has anyone's best interests at heart. Sounds to me he is in it only for himself. People drive down weeks street like they are on I-10. There are children out there riding bycycles and playing. I have every intention showing up at the next meeting and asking him to his face why he stopped this "

    Hilda wrote on Jun 28, 2009 11:52 AM:

    " I am very proud to have Sheriff Ackal as our Sheriff. I do want proper police protection here. Our Mayor should support him more and work with him more than she is. "

    I am not fooled wrote on Jun 28, 2009 9:26 AM:

    " Ackal is both a bully and a buffoon. The half page add he ran in today’s paper is the height of arrogance. He has the not too bright fooled, they think they are safer, but that is just a cruel joke. I have been dead set against bringing back the NIPD, but his abject failure as Sheriff has changed my mind. "

    Concerned Grandmother wrote on Jun 28, 2009 9:07 AM:

    " Was it Ackal that agreed to the contract?
    If he knew money was going to be that tight do like most dont purchase all new cars until you can afford it! What happens to people when they get in politics! But I'm sure most were already like that just hiding it! "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jun 28, 2009 8:31 AM:

    " to isahuner:

    What was the big problem with Sid Hebert? Its not like the criminals were dancing in the street under Sid Hebert.

    Sid Hebert was able to hold it together within his budget and have enough money left over to maintain his hairdo. "

    isahuner wrote on Jun 27, 2009 9:03 PM:

    " And all of you whiners prefered sid hebert.Sid did nothing for us not even controlled crime. Ackal is the best that we had in a long time.Ackal is no bully he just dont put up with any crap, he is a straight shooter "

    D. Hertz wrote on Jun 27, 2009 6:21 PM:

    " I think a lot of people are disgusted and ashamed at the bizarre behavior of Ackal. If he treats elected officials with such contempt and disdain, how do you think he will treat us peons?

    Ackal's bully attitude prevails throughout the department, just ask a few questions the next time you get stopped and see what I am talking about. He is breeding this bully attitude.

    This is not what we voted for. "

    Outraged wrote on Jun 27, 2009 4:24 PM:

    " Mr. Suire used to supply food to the sheriff dept for feeding of the prisoners. I don't know if he still does!!!! "

    David wrote on Jun 27, 2009 2:33 PM:

    " I am ashamed I voted for this man for sheriff. He is like an out of control school yard bully give me this or else. I hope someone good can straiten this mess out after next election. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment related to this story. Use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

•Comments must be approved by an editor or the publisher before appearing on the Web site but are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person supposedly posting an comment. Please consider this as you consider any statement made. A thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

• Please note your comments must attempt to follow basic rules of grammar and punctuation or they will not be posted. Do not use unfamiliar abbreviations or text-like short cuts, like ur for your. Please keep your tone civil. You can say someone's idea is stupid but you cannot say someone is stupid.

• Comments should deal with matters of public concern. Problems with private individuals or private companies are not likely to get posted.

• Questions or comments about items posted should be e-mailed to dailyiberian@bellsouth.net.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds


Contact Us

Subscribe
Vacation Hold
General Email

Mailing Address:
The Daily Iberian
P.O. Box 9290
New Iberia, LA
70562-9290

Street Address:
926 East Main St.
New Iberia, LA 70560

Phone:
(337) 365-6773

Fax:
(337)-367-9640

Inside Louisiana:
800-365-6773

Local Weather